When Clement Greenberg met Norman Rockwell

After World War II, the center of the art universe shifted and New York City replaced Paris as the home of the avant-garde. In Manhattan’s downtown bars and studios, passions ran high. Arguments about art and ideas often turned into celebrated drunken brawls. Amidst the turbulent turf wars, one art critic reigned supreme – Clement Greenberg. His discovery of Jackson Pollock led to the rise of Abstract Expressionism as the dominant art form in the post-war art world. His opinions were followed intensely, even feared, by artists, dealers, and collectors.

Mercedes Matter, Willem de Kooning, Philip Guston, Frank O’Hara, and Elaine de Kooning at Cedar Tavern, NYC, 1960. [Photo: Arthur Swoger]

Yet, despite the New York School’s position as the foremost movement in Modern Art, if you asked most Americans in the 1950s to name their favorite artist, they would probably have said Norman Rockwell, the beloved illustrator of covers for the Saturday Evening Post. For decades, the Post had been the most popular magazine of its time. Self-proclaimed as “America’s Magazine,” its covers depicted an ideal small-town America, not unlike the New England towns where Rockwell spent most of his adult life. In fact, his models were often his neighbors. His covers were regularly turned into posters and found their way onto the walls of homes across the country.

Norman Rockwell, “The Discovery,” Saturday Evening Post, December 29, 1956

This frustrated Clement Greenberg, who was justifiably proud of the emergence of New York as the global center of art. In his best-known essay, “Avant-Garde and Kitsch,” he struggled to understand how such a strange state of affairs was possible and why the citizens of his country were not embracing their great cultural victory. At the end of its very first sentence, he almost calls out Rockwell by name:

“One and the same civilization produces simultaneously two such different things as a poem by T. S. Eliot and a Tin Pan Alley song, or a painting by Braque and a Saturday Evening Post cover.”

For Greenberg, popular art or kitsch like Rockwell’s was a sign of the “decay” of society, made from “debased” materials and not “genuine culture.”  “Kitsch is the epitome of all that is spurious in the life of our times. Kitsch pretends to demand nothing of its customers except their money – not even their time.”

Jackson Pollock, Clement Greenberg, Helen Frankenthaler, Lee Krasner on Long Island, NY, c. 1950

While one might see the clash of values between Greenberg and Rockwell as just another example of the time-worn cultural battle between city dwellers and country folk, it wasn’t. Both men were actually native New Yorkers.  Greenberg was the child of Jewish immigrants who was born and went to school in the Bronx.

Rockwell not only grew up in the city (he was born in a boarding house on 103rd Street, near Amsterdam Avenue), but trained at some of its finest art schools – the National Academy of Design and the Art Students League. His first studio was in Hell’s Kitchen and his second just under the Brooklyn Bridge. Even though he would ultimately spend most of his adult life in New England and be identified with it, he never lost his Upper West Side accent.

While still in school, Rockwell’s illustration career took off. By the time he was 19, he was the art editor of Boy’s Life, the official publication of the Boy Scouts of America. The next year, he created his first cover for the Saturday Evening Post.

Norman Rockwell’s first cover for Boys’ Life, when he was 19

While Rockwell was, of course, proud of his success, he also was well aware of the criticisms of his subject matter by critics and fellow artists. He would defend himself in statements like, “I was showing the America I knew and observed to others who might not have noticed.”

But deep down, he also wished his work would be accepted by art critics and ultimately judged as worthy of the great museums. During a visit to Rembrandt’s house in Amsterdam, he reportedly yelled, “Rembrandt? It’s me, Norman.… What do you think?”

In reality, like many artists, Rockwell was secretly plagued by doubts and wondered if his work was really any good. During the 1950s, Rockwell was treated by Erik Erikson, the famous psychiatrist who coined the term “identity crisis.” Rockwell had recently moved his family from Vermont to the Berkshires, so his wife could get treatment at the Stockbridge Massachusetts clinic where Erikson worked. Rockwell and the psychoanalyst became good friends. Erikson, who as a young man had tried to be an artist, would even give Rockwell suggestions on ways to develop his paintings.

Norman Rockwell, Portrait of Erik Erikson, 1962. Charcoal on paper. 

While America embraced Rockwell, the art world did not. As for Clement Greenberg, he showed no sign of budging in his assessment of Rockwell. His dismissal of Rockwell at times even approached cruelty: “you have to put Rockwell down, down below the rank of minor artist. He chose not to be serious.”

Norman Rockwell in his studio, c. 1950

The Secret Visit

Greenberg’s callous statement makes an event from 1951 appear inexplicable. On August 16th, Greenberg, along with the painter Helen Frankenthaler, paid a secret visit to Rockwell’s personal studio. His appointment calendar for the day notes: “Norman Rockwell’s at 5.”

What could possibly have motivated the titan of avant-garde theory to ask for this meeting? And why would Rockwell, who surely knew of Greenberg’s animosity to his art, agree to it?

The key can be found in the dream of a first-generation American kid from the Bronx. What no one familiar with his essays and ideas would ever guess is that as a young man “Clem” idolized Norman Rockwell.

Like many children of upwardly striving immigrants, Clement Greenberg was expected to work with his father once he finished school. But he rebelled because he had other ideas. Greenberg was determined to be an artist – an artist like Norman Rockwell. Perhaps as a first-generation American, he saw those iconic images as a path to legitimacy.

He drew insistently and painted many pictures. In time, however, Greenberg realized that he could never be a successful artist like Rockwell and abandoned his dream for the life of an art critic.

From Frankenthaler’s account, we can tell that the visit in the summer of 1951 was not what one would expect – a clash of titans from opposite sides of the American art world. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

They were welcomed by Rockwell into his studio. On his easel, Greenberg and Frankenthaler saw what would become one of Rockwell’s most famous paintings, Saying Grace, in progress. Rockwell explained that it was going to be the cover for the upcoming Thanksgiving issue of the Saturday Evening Post.

Norman Rockwell, Saying Grace, 1951

At this point, it only had its underpainting, all in grays, as is typical in academic paintings. The painting showed a grandma and grandson praying in a diner while two teenagers seem perplexed by their behavior.

Saying Grace was as far from an avant-garde painting as could be imagined. Yet, the art critic and young artist were taken with it. They told Rockwell it was wonderful and begged him to make no further changes.

During the visit, Greenberg revealed to Rockwell that he had loved his work as a young man. We can only assume that the older artist was truly touched by this. According to Frankenthaler, Rockwell’s modest and kind response to Greenberg was, “I hope your taste has grown.”

Norman Rockwell: Abstract Expressionist

Because of a painting from ten years later, we can guess that Greenberg’s visit made a lasting impression on Rockwell. In Connoisseur from 1961, for once the illustrator decided to follow the dictums of Clement Greenberg and threw himself into fully experiencing action painting.

Norman Rockwell, Connoisseur, 1961

Rockwell built Connoisseur in three steps. The most remarkable was the first. After studying articles in art magazines, he painted a convincing abstract expressionist canvas. Imitating Jackson Pollock‘s working methods, Rockwell spread the canvas on the floor and moved around it as he flung paint.

Norman Rockwell working on Connoisseur in his studio, 1961

Then he switched back to his normal approach and made a painting of just the observer. Finally, he combining the two as a collage and painted a final version based on it that ultimately became the cover for the Saturday Evening Post.

Rockwell liked the first abstract canvas enough to divide it into at least two other paintings that he submitted to exhibitions, although he kept his identity secret by signing them with an Italian name. At the Cooperstown Art Association in New York, one part of Connoisseur took first prize for painting. Another section won Honorable Mention at the Berkshire Museum.

The Connoisseur cover was not an ironic effort by Rockwell to mock Abstract Expressionism. He truly admired the movement, even telling an art critic toward the end of his life, “If I were young, I would paint that way myself.”

Just as surprising, Greenberg was not the only member of the New York School who admired Norman Rockwell. Willem de Kooning, arguably its greatest painter, loved his pictures. When he saw Connoisseur on the Saturday Evening Post, de Kooning proclaimed, “Square inch by square inch, it’s better than Jackson!”

Willem de Kooning, Woman and Bicycle, 1952-53

This was no idle remark or a snide put-down of a rival painter. Years later, he forced an art critic to study a Rockwell illustration with a magnifying glass to understand Rockwell’s painting skill. “See?” de Kooning said with enthusiasm, “Abstract Expressionism!”

Norman Rockwell would have appreciated that.

Cold? Rembrandt’s studio was probably colder.

Rembrandt Artist in his studio MFAIn Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts, there is a small Rembrandt of an artist at work in his studio that symbolizes the difficulty of making art. The dark, large canvas on the easel seems huge and forbidding.  With thick, spread legs, it dominates the picture and looms over the artist, who appears to have backed away from it, perhaps in fear.

However, this painting has taken on a whole new meaning for me because of this frigid winter in the Northern U.S.  While I never gave it a thought in the past, the artist (who resembles Rembrandt) is clearly unnaturally bundled up in heavy clothing even though he is inside.

Artist in his studio detailWhat is going on? Is the studio cold because the artist lacks the money to heat it? Or is it something else?

Painted around 1628, when Rembrandt was in his early twenties, the studio’s bareness could simply depict a struggling, young artist and the tools of his trade.  We can see his palettes hanging behind him, brushes and a maul stick in his hands.  To the right, is a large grinding stone where he makes his paints. To the left, is a table probably with jugs of oil and solvent.Rembrandthuis: grinding stone and materials

If you visit Rembrandt’s studio in Amsterdam – Rembrandthuis — you can see many of the same things and even witness a demonstration of how he ground his dry pigments into a paste by mixing them with oil. This stone looks nearly identical to the one there.

iceage_castle

Hendrick Avercamp, A Winter Scene with Skaters near a Castle, c. 1608–1609, oil on panel, The National Gallery, London

But his clothing is a clue to something else.  In 1628, Europe was in the midst of what is known as “the Little Ice Age.”  By the time of the painting, global cooling had been underway for more than a century.  In winter, the canals of Holland would freeze over and not thaw again until late in the spring. Growing glaciers had crushed small villages in Switzerland. The importance of the North American trade in beaver pelts was a direct result of climate change. Rembrandt’s artist is probably wearing a felt hat quite popular in this era and made from those pelts. [The phrase “mad as a hatter” comes from the dangerous effects of the chemicals used to treat beaver fur.]

At the time of this painting, Amsterdam was rapidly growing and had become the most important port and economic center of Europe.  Homes were heated by burning peat harvested from bogs. Because of the rapid growth of Holland’s population, however, the peat bogs had nearly been exhausted and peat’s cost skyrocketed.

The combination of expensive fuel and the peaking of The Little Ice Age made for a poor time for a young artist to start his career. No wonder he is bundled up and fearful. It was really a cold world out there. I hope he sold the painting.

 

See and hear Matisse — drawing with charcoal and scissors

henri_mattise_drawing_3The following two short videos provide brief glimpses of Henri Matisse at work in his studio.  In the first from 1946, he draws a portrait of his grandson, Gerard, with charcoal. In the second, he was filmed near the end of his life “drawing with scissors,” which is how he described his method of working with hand-colored papers.

Besides the rare opportunity to see Matisse at work, we can also hear his voice in the first video.  He is explaining how he thinks about drawing. His comments translated into English are:

“Me, I believe that painting and drawing are the same thing. Drawing is a painting done in a simpler, limited way. On a white surface, a sheet of paper, with a pen and some ink, one creates a certain contrast with volumes; one can change the quality of the paper given supple surfaces, light surfaces, hard surfaces without always adding shadow or light. For me, drawing is a painting with limited means.”

 

Lydia Delectorskaya, Hôtel Régina, Nice, c. 1953 Courtesy Henri Matisse Archives

Lydia Delectorskaya, Hôtel Régina, Nice, c. 1953
Courtesy Henri Matisse Archives

Jacqueline Duhême, one of Matisse’s studio assistants in the late 1940s, describes how he made his cut-outs here.

See Monet Painting Waterlilies

MonetpaintingsnapIn our continuing series of peeks into artist studios — a unique item.  A rare 2 1/2 minute film that shows Monet painting his waterlily pond in Giverny in 1914.  And his little dog, too.

 

Claude Monet, Water Lilies, c. 1915 Neue Pinakothek, Munich Germany

Claude Monet, Water Lilies, c. 1915
Neue Pinakothek, Munich Germany

[Thanks to Vincent Pidone for the tip.]

Duncan’s Dog meets Picasso

Dachshund-Picasso-SketchIn April 1957, the photographer David Douglas Duncan visited his friend Picasso at La Californie, the artist’s villa in the South of France.  He brought along his dachshund, Lump, and a mutual love affair began.

Picasso and his wife, Jacqueline, were having lunch when Lump first saw Picasso.  The confident young dog immediately walked up to him and put his paws on the man Duncan always referred to as “Maestro.”  Picasso looked down and said, “Buenos dias, amigo!” Lump jumped into Picasso’s arms and gave him a kiss.  Jacqueline was shocked. While Picasso’s own dogs were often in his studios, Jacqueline had never seen Picasso allow them to sit in his lap. But Lump was no ordinary dog.  He immediately made himself at home and thereafter became a regular visitor. Continue reading

A visit to Frida Kahlo’s studio

Gallery

This gallery contains 14 photos.

Frida Kahlo‘s home and studio, La Casa Azul in suburban Mexico City has been renovated in time to celebrate her 107th birthday. On the second floor, one can visit her studio just as she left it when she died in … Continue reading

For those who like to peek into artist’s studios

I’ve discovered a wonderful blog, atelierlog.  Since 2005, the Dutch artist, Harke Kazemier, has been collecting and posting looks into artist studios, from Rembrandt to Lucian Freud. While some of the text is in Dutch, the main content is the pictures and videos. If you are like me, you’ll find the more than a thousand entries fascinating. atelierlog is a rich resource that I highly recommend.

Joel Peter Witkin: Las Meninas, 1987

Joel Peter Witkin: Las Meninas, 1987

The Dove: Picasso and Matisse

 

Picasso, Dove of Peace, 1949

Picasso, Dove of Peace, 1949

One of Picasso’s most famous and popular images is his lithograph of a dove as a symbol of peace.  But the dove was Matisse’s.  Literally.

Matisse and Picasso first met at the salon of the American patroness and writer Gertrude Stein’s in the early 1900s.  At the time they were rivals for both her affections and those of the modern artists of Paris.  Picasso’s followers once plastered the walls of Montmartre with anti-Matisse graffiti like “Matisse drives you mad!” and “Matisse does more harm than war!”  Matisse responded by using the term “Cubism” to mock the art of Picasso and his followers, a label that would, of course, stick.

As they grew older, they grew closer.  By the end of World War II, the old rivals had truly become great friends.  Matisse was now almost eighty, nearly bed-ridden and living in apartments in Vence, a town close to Nice.  His wife, Amelie, had recently divorced him; his children were grown with children of their own. His bedroom and studio were filled with birds and plants to keep him company and inspire him.

Matisse and Doves, Vence, 1944 Henri Cartier-Bresson

Matisse and Doves, Vence, 1944
Henri Cartier-Bresson

Picasso, along with his mistress, Francoise Gilot, was a regular visitor whenever they came south. They often exchanged paintings and even exhibited together.  Matisse kept a Picasso over his bedroom’s mantelpiece and Picasso displayed his Matisses in his studio. Picasso, who was eleven years younger, would bring recent paintings to Matisse for comments.  An engraver who did work for both of them said Picasso thought of Matisse “as an elder brother.”  Matisse thought of his rival as “the kid.” Their arguments continued, but more like sibling rivalry as they sat alone at the pinnacle of the art world.

When Matisse took on his last great commission —  the chapel of Vence — he emptied his living quarters so he could cover the walls with brightly colored cut-papers and not be distracted.  He bid a sad farewell to the plants that one can see in so many of his paintings. His exotic pigeons were sent to Picasso.

Continue reading