When Clement Greenberg met Norman Rockwell

After World War II, the center of the art universe shifted and New York City replaced Paris as the home of the avant-garde. In Manhattan’s downtown bars and studios, passions ran high. Arguments about art and ideas often turned into celebrated drunken brawls. Amidst the turbulent turf wars, one art critic reigned supreme – Clement Greenberg. His discovery of Jackson Pollock led to the rise of Abstract Expressionism as the dominant art form in the post-war art world. His opinions were followed intensely, even feared, by artists, dealers, and collectors.

Mercedes Matter, Willem de Kooning, Philip Guston, Frank O’Hara, and Elaine de Kooning at Cedar Tavern, NYC, 1960. [Photo: Arthur Swoger]

Yet, despite the New York School’s position as the foremost movement in Modern Art, if you asked most Americans in the 1950s to name their favorite artist, they would probably have said Norman Rockwell, the beloved illustrator of covers for the Saturday Evening Post. For decades, the Post had been the most popular magazine of its time. Self-proclaimed as “America’s Magazine,” its covers depicted an ideal small-town America, not unlike the New England towns where Rockwell spent most of his adult life. In fact, his models were often his neighbors. His covers were regularly turned into posters and found their way onto the walls of homes across the country.

Norman Rockwell, “The Discovery,” Saturday Evening Post, December 29, 1956

This frustrated Clement Greenberg, who was justifiably proud of the emergence of New York as the global center of art. In his best-known essay, “Avant-Garde and Kitsch,” he struggled to understand how such a strange state of affairs was possible and why the citizens of his country were not embracing their great cultural victory. At the end of its very first sentence, he almost calls out Rockwell by name:

“One and the same civilization produces simultaneously two such different things as a poem by T. S. Eliot and a Tin Pan Alley song, or a painting by Braque and a Saturday Evening Post cover.”

For Greenberg, popular art or kitsch like Rockwell’s was a sign of the “decay” of society, made from “debased” materials and not “genuine culture.”  “Kitsch is the epitome of all that is spurious in the life of our times. Kitsch pretends to demand nothing of its customers except their money – not even their time.”

Jackson Pollock, Clement Greenberg, Helen Frankenthaler, Lee Krasner on Long Island, NY, c. 1950

While one might see the clash of values between Greenberg and Rockwell as just another example of the time-worn cultural battle between city dwellers and country folk, it wasn’t. Both men were actually native New Yorkers.  Greenberg was the child of Jewish immigrants who was born and went to school in the Bronx.

Rockwell not only grew up in the city (he was born in a boarding house on 103rd Street, near Amsterdam Avenue), but trained at some of its finest art schools – the National Academy of Design and the Art Students League. His first studio was in Hell’s Kitchen and his second just under the Brooklyn Bridge. Even though he would ultimately spend most of his adult life in New England and be identified with it, he never lost his Upper West Side accent.

While still in school, Rockwell’s illustration career took off. By the time he was 19, he was the art editor of Boy’s Life, the official publication of the Boy Scouts of America. The next year, he created his first cover for the Saturday Evening Post.

Norman Rockwell’s first cover for Boys’ Life, when he was 19

While Rockwell was, of course, proud of his success, he also was well aware of the criticisms of his subject matter by critics and fellow artists. He would defend himself in statements like, “I was showing the America I knew and observed to others who might not have noticed.”

But deep down, he also wished his work would be accepted by art critics and ultimately judged as worthy of the great museums. During a visit to Rembrandt’s house in Amsterdam, he reportedly yelled, “Rembrandt? It’s me, Norman.… What do you think?”

In reality, like many artists, Rockwell was secretly plagued by doubts and wondered if his work was really any good. During the 1950s, Rockwell was treated by Erik Erikson, the famous psychiatrist who coined the term “identity crisis.” Rockwell had recently moved his family from Vermont to the Berkshires, so his wife could get treatment at the Stockbridge Massachusetts clinic where Erikson worked. Rockwell and the psychoanalyst became good friends. Erikson, who as a young man had tried to be an artist, would even give Rockwell suggestions on ways to develop his paintings.

Norman Rockwell, Portrait of Erik Erikson, 1962. Charcoal on paper. 

While America embraced Rockwell, the art world did not. As for Clement Greenberg, he showed no sign of budging in his assessment of Rockwell. His dismissal of Rockwell at times even approached cruelty: “you have to put Rockwell down, down below the rank of minor artist. He chose not to be serious.”

Norman Rockwell in his studio, c. 1950

The Secret Visit

Greenberg’s callous statement makes an event from 1951 appear inexplicable. On August 16th, Greenberg, along with the painter Helen Frankenthaler, paid a secret visit to Rockwell’s personal studio. His appointment calendar for the day notes: “Norman Rockwell’s at 5.”

What could possibly have motivated the titan of avant-garde theory to ask for this meeting? And why would Rockwell, who surely knew of Greenberg’s animosity to his art, agree to it?

The key can be found in the dream of a first-generation American kid from the Bronx. What no one familiar with his essays and ideas would ever guess is that as a young man “Clem” idolized Norman Rockwell.

Like many children of upwardly striving immigrants, Clement Greenberg was expected to work with his father once he finished school. But he rebelled because he had other ideas. Greenberg was determined to be an artist – an artist like Norman Rockwell. Perhaps as a first-generation American, he saw those iconic images as a path to legitimacy.

He drew insistently and painted many pictures. In time, however, Greenberg realized that he could never be a successful artist like Rockwell and abandoned his dream for the life of an art critic.

From Frankenthaler’s account, we can tell that the visit in the summer of 1951 was not what one would expect – a clash of titans from opposite sides of the American art world. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

They were welcomed by Rockwell into his studio. On his easel, Greenberg and Frankenthaler saw what would become one of Rockwell’s most famous paintings, Saying Grace, in progress. Rockwell explained that it was going to be the cover for the upcoming Thanksgiving issue of the Saturday Evening Post.

Norman Rockwell, Saying Grace, 1951

At this point, it only had its underpainting, all in grays, as is typical in academic paintings. The painting showed a grandma and grandson praying in a diner while two teenagers seem perplexed by their behavior.

Saying Grace was as far from an avant-garde painting as could be imagined. Yet, the art critic and young artist were taken with it. They told Rockwell it was wonderful and begged him to make no further changes.

During the visit, Greenberg revealed to Rockwell that he had loved his work as a young man. We can only assume that the older artist was truly touched by this. According to Frankenthaler, Rockwell’s modest and kind response to Greenberg was, “I hope your taste has grown.”

Norman Rockwell: Abstract Expressionist

Because of a painting from ten years later, we can guess that Greenberg’s visit made a lasting impression on Rockwell. In Connoisseur from 1961, for once the illustrator decided to follow the dictums of Clement Greenberg and threw himself into fully experiencing action painting.

Norman Rockwell, Connoisseur, 1961

Rockwell built Connoisseur in three steps. The most remarkable was the first. After studying articles in art magazines, he painted a convincing abstract expressionist canvas. Imitating Jackson Pollock‘s working methods, Rockwell spread the canvas on the floor and moved around it as he flung paint.

Norman Rockwell working on Connoisseur in his studio, 1961

Then he switched back to his normal approach and made a painting of just the observer. Finally, he combining the two as a collage and painted a final version based on it that ultimately became the cover for the Saturday Evening Post.

Rockwell liked the first abstract canvas enough to divide it into at least two other paintings that he submitted to exhibitions, although he kept his identity secret by signing them with an Italian name. At the Cooperstown Art Association in New York, one part of Connoisseur took first prize for painting. Another section won Honorable Mention at the Berkshire Museum.

The Connoisseur cover was not an ironic effort by Rockwell to mock Abstract Expressionism. He truly admired the movement, even telling an art critic toward the end of his life, “If I were young, I would paint that way myself.”

Just as surprising, Greenberg was not the only member of the New York School who admired Norman Rockwell. Willem de Kooning, arguably its greatest painter, loved his pictures. When he saw Connoisseur on the Saturday Evening Post, de Kooning proclaimed, “Square inch by square inch, it’s better than Jackson!”

Willem de Kooning, Woman and Bicycle, 1952-53

This was no idle remark or a snide put-down of a rival painter. Years later, he forced an art critic to study a Rockwell illustration with a magnifying glass to understand Rockwell’s painting skill. “See?” de Kooning said with enthusiasm, “Abstract Expressionism!”

Norman Rockwell would have appreciated that.

Kokoschka’s Alma Mahler doll

A strange, life-size doll is at the center of one of the Modern era’s most bizarre episodes. Its inspiration was the sudden end of an intense love affair between the Expressionist painter Oskar Kokoschka and the fascinating Alma Mahler.

Born in 1879, Alma Maria Schindler grew up surrounded by the best of Viennese society. Her father was a noted painter; Crown Prince Rudolf was one of his patrons. While she would become a composer and a writer, it is her love affairs with some of the most important artists, architects, and composers of the 20th century that have kept her celebrity alive since her death in 1964. Continue reading

Father Ivan and his Children

Ivan Sutherland and his robot crawler, 1983

In 1982, Ivan Sutherland got on a six-legged walking robot he had built and took his first ride. His students at Carnegie Mellon Institute called the eight foot long machine “The Trojan Cockroach.” To Sutherland it was as an “electric animal,” which he made because he thought it would be fun. Fun has always been Sutherland’s inspiration.

When denied my minimum daily adult dose of technology, I get grouchy. I believe that technology is fun, especially when computers are involved, a sort of grand game or puzzle with ever so neat parts to fit together. I have turned down several lucrative administrative jobs because they would deny me that fun. If the technology you do isn’t fun for you, you may wish to seek other employment. Without the fun, none of us would go on.”

The Trojan Cockroach was the first computer controlled robot that could carry a human being. But it is merely a footnote in the life of the man known as “Father Ivan,” since he is the person who gave birth to computer graphics and who, along with his many students, helped usher in the Computer Age.

Sketchpad

Sketchpad demonstrated in 1963.

Computer graphics was born in 1962. Its twenty-four year old father, Ivan Sutherland, was then a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his child, who he named Sketchpad, was his doctoral thesis. Sutherland’s program for MIT’s TX2 computer enabled him to draw directly on its nine-inch cathode ray tube with a light pen. For the first time in history, digital images were created by hand and appeared as the artist was working on them (rather than in a printout hours later). Continue reading

Loïe Fuller: Artist and Inspiration

While at the Cleveland Art Museum earlier this month, my attention was caught by an impressive plaster head by Rodin. It was immediately familiar as a large scale version of one of the heads from his famous The Burghers of Calais, but I thought it even more moving in its own right. The marks of Rodin’s fingers as he created such a sorrowful expression were amplified by pencil marks and the traces of colored washes — I never knew Rodin did such things. But I was surprised a second time when I read the label and it said “Gift of Loïe Fuller.”

I was already aware that Loïe Fuller was an extraordinary woman. Could she be even more extraordinary than I knew?

Marie Louise Fuller was born in 1862 on a farm outside of Chicago. As a young girl, she was inspired to be an actress by Sarah Bernhardt. She found her truer calling while acting in a play, when she twirled her long white skirt in a way that suggested a rising butterfly. The audience loved it and soon she was performing across the country as a dancer in vaudeville, burlesque, and even Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show.  Known best for her free-spirited Serpentine dance, today she is considered one of the founders of Modern Dance despite never having taken any lessons. But it wasn’t until she was 30 and crossed the Atlantic that she became one of the most famous dancers in the world.

As Loïe Fuller, she became the toast of Paris when she opened her show at the Folies-Bergère in 1892. At the center of an empty dark stage, Fuller entered in a white silk costume of her own design and then flung the material out in ever-changing huge abstract forms. Unbeknownst to the audience, inside hundreds of yards of fabric, she had sewn in bamboo sticks to push out the shapes. Colored lights, manipulated with mirrors from the sides of the stage, illuminated the billowing forms. Audiences were mesmerized by the magical metamorphosis taking place before their eyes.

Continue reading

Bernini’s Passionate Affair

Regular visitors to Florence’s Bargello, home to its great sculpture collection, know well the frustration of finding rooms, sometimes the whole second floor, closed. Imagine my shock in June to discover that not only was the second floor open but galleries I had never seen before. In one, amidst display cases with coins, was a treasure I didn’t know existed, but learned later was quite famous and considered perhaps Gianlorenzo Bernini’s finest portrait sculpture – his bust of Costanza Bonarelli. According to the label,

This celebrated bust is the most famous of Bernini’s portraits. It is a very ‘private’ image that he perhaps made for himself and kept in his home for a long time…

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Portrait of Costanza Bonarelli, marble, 1637-1638. Museo Nazionale del Bargello, Florence.

Costanza was the wife of one of Bernini’s assistants, when the artist was in his late thirties and working in Rome. He fell passionately in love with her and carried on an illicit affair.

Sensuality is a hallmark of Bernini’s work. The passion in his Ecstasy of Saint Teresa is well-known to every art history student. Gazing at his much more direct portrait of Costanza, it is not hard to share the feelings of the sculptor for this young woman. She seems to be portrayed just after a liaison. Her hair is disheveled, her dressing gown is wrinkled, unbuttoned, and hangs loosely across her breasts. One can easily imagine that her make-up is long gone. Costanza looks out with parted, sensual lips and seems a bit dazed.

Bonarelli was no servant girl, but a member of the noble Piccolomini family of Siena, whose members included two popes, the dukes of Amalfi, and the patron of Galileo. However, by the 1600s the fortunes of her family line had tumbled and, before she married, the young Costanza had received money from two religious fraternities to keep her from a life on the streets. Her husband, Matteo, began working for Bernini about two years before this sculpture was made in 1637 or 1638. At the time, Costanza was about 24 years old and had been married for five years.

Continue reading

The Journey of Mario’s Legendary Father

Ancient burial caves of the Zuiganji Temple in Matsushima, JapanAround 1960, a small boy who liked to explore nature without a map was wandering in the forest near his village. He was frightened when he accidentally discovered the entrance to a cave in the woods. Later, he got up the courage to return alone from his house with a lantern. His decision to explore the cave’s passageways would take on greater meaning in the years to come.

The boy was Shigeru Miyamoto and he grew up to be one of the founding fathers of electronic game design. As a young man, he wanted to be a manga artist and went to college for art and design. After graduation, his father got him an interview at an old Japanese company that specialized in playing cards, but had begun to expand its offerings into electronic toys – Nintendo. Miyamoto brought children’s clothes hangers in the shape of animals that he had designed and convinced the company to hire its first artist.

A couple of years later, motivated by the huge success of video arcades, Nintendo built their own version of Space Invaders that failed dismally. Stuck with two thousand unsold arcade units, they turned to their artist and asked if he could come up with a better game. At this time, video arcades games, while popular, were little more than shapes shooting and attacking other shapes. But in 1982 that all changed when Nintendo released Miyamoto’s Donkey Kong. Donkey Kong was the first arcade game with a story and characters – a gorilla, the girl he kidnapped but loved, and a hero – a carpenter known in this game as “Mr. Video,” later “Jumpman,” and finally, “Mario” (named for the landlord of Nintendo’s warehouse in Seattle, Washington). Continue reading

Diary of an Affair: Picasso and Marie-Thérèse

As the sun set in Paris, on January 8, 1927, Pablo Picasso was walking past a fashionable department store when his eyes fell upon a young shopper. Immediately infatuated, the artist (then unhappily married and in his mid-forties) took Marie-Thérèse Walter by the arm and said, “I’m Picasso! You and I are going to do great things together!” She was confused by the man and unaware of who he might be. Picasso introduced himself by dragging her into a bookshop and showing her a book filled with reproductions of his paintings. Thus began a passionate affair and an enormously productive period for Picasso. Continue reading

Update on the Missing Botticelli

Botticelli St Augustine restored bannerIt was a stormy afternoon (not night), when I nervously entered Florence’s Ognissanti Church to check if Botticelli’s St. Augustine had finally returned. My last meeting had run late and I was out of breath. Tomorrow my flight was leaving at sunrise, so this would be my last chance. I walked at top speed nearly the whole way, because it was close to closing time. There was no time to take more than a few irresistible last looks at the city (Santa Maria Novella, the Arno).  Luckily, a thunderstorm had just ended, thinning the crowds of tourists, but the stone pavement was slippery in spots along the way.

For the past three years, I had made this pilgrimage, only to experience disappointment. Ognissanti, one of the important neighborhood parish churches of Florence, has quite a few treasures, like its beautifully restored, spectacular 15 foot tall crucifix by Giotto. It is also the final resting place of Sandro Botticelli, his tomb near the feet of his unrequited love, Simonetta Vespucci, the model for The Birth of Venus and other masterpieces. Visitors from around the world leave love notes addressed to the artist there.

But one of my favorite Botticelli frescoes, St. Augustine in his Study (1480), has been missing for years, its place taken by a mounted, fading color photocopy. Just across the aisle hangs a fresco designed to be the other half of a pair — Domenico Ghirlandaio’s St. Jerome in his Study (1480).  St. Jerome appears to be looking across at St. Augustine. Leaning his head in his hand, he seemed to, while trying to be philosophical, share my frustration looking across at the poor copy.

Domenico Ghirlandaio, St. Jerome in his Study (1480)

Domenico Ghirlandaio, St. Jerome in his Study,  1480

Continue reading

Vigée Le Brun’s unfortunate marriage

Lebrun,_Self-portraitThe odds were stacked against Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, yet she became one of the most successful court portrait painters in France during the reign of Louis XVI. Many troubles would come her way during her life. But the worst may not have been the French Revolution, it may have been her husband.

Born in Paris in 1755, Élisabeth Vigée demonstrated great artistic promise as as a young girl. Her father, a pastel artist himself, told her, “You will be a painter, my child, if ever there was one.” Still, her application to train at the painter’s guild was denied because she was a female (even though her father was a member). Forced to learn at home, she set herself on a course that mirrored academic training by copying plaster casts and engravings. While her father helped with lessons, her mother took her to exhibitions and acted as her chaperon when the young Élisabeth visited homes to work on portraits.

By the age of 19, she already had a successful career. Too successful — she attracted the attention of the local authorities, who closed her studio down because she was not a member of the artist’s guild. To make matters worse, after her father’s untimely death when she was 12, her mother had married a wealthy jeweler who collected the young artist’s fees and was not eager to share them with her.

Young Self-Portrait

Young Self-Portrait, c. 1782?

Vigée managed to gain admission to the painter’s guild after they unsuspectingly exhibited her paintings at their annual exhibition in 1774. By then, the daughter (whom her mother once thought homely) had become a beautiful young woman who attracted not only commissions but the attentions of many important people, including Jean Baptiste Pierre Lebrun, the most successful art dealer in Paris. Le Brun was one of the first dealers to sell artworks as investments and was an innovator in making art a much more international trade.

Jean-Baptiste Pierre Le Brun (1748-1813), Self-Portrait, Salon of 1795

Jean-Baptiste Pierre Le Brun (1748-1813), Self-Portrait, Salon of 1795

According to Vigée, Le Brun invited her often to his mansion, which was filled with art. “I was enchanted at an opportunity of first hand acquaintance with…works of the great masters. M. Lebrun was so obliging as to lend me, for the purposes of copying some of his handsomest and most valuable paintings.”

To her surprise, in 1776, Le Brun asked her to marry him. Already a favorite portrait artist of Paris’s aristocratic women, she wondered if it was wise to give up the name by which she had become well known. But her home-life was becoming miserable. Her stepfather had retired, was becoming increasingly ill-tempered, and was hoarding her earnings.

Continue reading

The truly Old Masters, Modern edition

matisse at workVolume 2 of our series “Truly Old Masters” focuses on Modern and Contemporary artists who lived long and fruitful lives in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries (except Americans, who will be the subject of Volume 3). Since medical care improved considerably after 1900, it has become more and more common for artists to live to a ripe old age. That’s why for this volume we’ve raised the bar from 75 to 80 years old. Still, the list is long, even though it covers not much more than a century.

While there are plenty of artists who worry about aging, many celebrate it as an opportunity to do more and better work. To congratulate the Swedish director Ingmar Bergman on reaching his 70th birthday, the 77 year old film-maker Akira Kurosawa wrote to him about an artist who “bloomed when he reached eighty.” Kurosawa, who lived to 88 and continued to write films almost to the end, told Bergman that he realized his own work “was only beginning” and that artists are “not really capable of creating really good works until [they] reach the age of 80.”

2009-louise-bourgeois

Louise Bourgeois in 2009

Recent studies are debunking the old theories that great artists (and scientists, for that matter) do their best work by the time they are thirty. The sculptor Louise Bourgeois who lived nearly to 100, described herself as a ‘long distance runner.’ When she was 84, she was asked whether she could have made a recent work when she was younger. She replied, “Absolutely not.” When asked why, she explained, “I was not sophisticated enough.”

Old age is not without its hazards, but even they can be inspiring. Henri Matisse suffered from a near fatal illness in his seventies.  After he survived a dangerous surgery, he said,

“My terrible operation has completely rejuvenated and made a philosopher of me. I had so completely prepared for my exit from life that it seems to me that I am in a second life.”

Despite being mostly bedridden, his ‘second life’ led to the exuberant, colorful paper cut-outs that occupied him for the rest of his life.

Below is a gallery of portraits and works by twentieth century artists who did not die young but lived long enough to truly become old masters. [Click on an image to begin slide show.] Continue reading